Lifestyle Design – What does it take to be alive – and the perfect Pepsi?
“When
you buy furniture, you tell yourself, that's it. That's the last sofa
l'll need. Whatever happens, that sofa problem is handled.”
l'd
flip through catalogues and wonder... ''What kind of dining set
defines me as a person?''
l
had it all. Even the glass dishes with tiny bubbles and
imperfections...
-
Fight Club
I
have always liked to write. Considering that fact that I am doing it
quite successfully, I'll let you know an insider secret about what I
did when I started writing my first blog.
So,
I decide to start writing a blog. I asked myself, what application
should I use to write professionally, cause I dont wanna get my work
going bad because of some sloppy software.
I Google around and
find that there are a ton of writing applications suiting several
needs. I read and review a lot of these applications and finally
settle deeply disturbed over my naivety to choose one.
And
then I had an outbreak. I started writing in notepad. That was
enough. The problem solved itself, it just needed some time. Over
time, I needed some serious word processing power and had to switch
over to LibreOffice - a free office suite. From then on, all my posts
were written on it. Maybe I'll need more sophisticated software in
the future. Tomorrow is another day.
It
is in this simple action that life exists. It can be typing in a
notepad or typing in LibreOffice, but they do not make a difference.
What makes a difference is, whether you are acting, whether you are
alive.
What
I observed about this event is that there exists a difference between
doing things when they are required, and doing things based on future
estimated requirements. The latter only succeeds only when the future
requirements are identified to a better degree, but in the absence of
such factual data, working based on future requirements only serves a
futile purpose, and sometimes the opposite of the intended response.
But
do we know what we want?
I
recently watched a TED talk by Malcolm Gladwell in which he spoke
about research and contribution by Howard towards consumer choice.
Pepsi approached Howard to identify the correct combination of
ingredients for the perfect Pepsi. But Howard was not able to
determine that particular Pepsi. His data which he obtained by
testing ingredients in various percentages did not point a single
combination of the perfect drink.
In
the talk titled, “Choice, happiness and spaghetti sauce”, Malcolm
Gladwell repeats the line, “There is no one perfect Pepsi, there
are perfect Pepsis'”. (As
in different groups of people like different Pepsi, containing
different combinations of the ingredient).
Sometimes
what we want comes right before us and only then do we know that it
is what makes us tick.
So
how do we make this object, this perfect Pepsi, to reach out to us?
Well, all I can say is, keep looking, stay alive.
PS
: I originally wrote, “Over
time,
I needed some serious word processing power and had to switch over to
LibreOffice” as, “Over
a period of time,
I needed some serious word..... “ and the LibreOffice writer plugin
Language Tool, gracefully identified it as a repetition. Pretty
impressive.
Comments